Australia’s food future: A recipe for trouble?

Two major developments in global nutrition research and national policy have collided, raising questions about the future health of Australians. A landmark international review has found that ultra-processed foods (UPFs) are linked to harm in nearly every major organ system, while Australia’s new national food policy could make these products even more dominant in the national diet.

The scientific review examined dozens of studies and concluded that high consumption of UPFs—foods heavily modified with additives, emulsifiers, and industrial ingredients—correlates with 32 harmful health outcomes. These include increased risks of heart disease, cancer, Type 2 Diabetes, depression, and even cognitive decline. Researchers warn that the damage is systemic, affecting cardiovascular, metabolic, and neurological health.

At the same time, Australia’s recently announced food policy aims to boost agricultural exports and streamline supply chains. Critics argue that the policy prioritizes economic efficiency over nutritional quality, paving the way for greater reliance on mass-produced, highly processed foods. This could worsen an already troubling trend: Australians consume some of the highest levels of UPFs globally, with packaged snacks, sugary drinks, and processed meats dominating supermarket shelves.

Public health experts fear the combination of these factors will deepen health inequalities. UPFs are often cheaper and more accessible than fresh produce, making them a default choice for low-income households. If policy incentives favour large-scale manufacturers, the diversity of whole foods could shrink further, leaving consumers with fewer healthy options.

The stakes are high. Chronic diseases linked to poor diet already cost Australia billions in healthcare and lost productivity. Adding more UPFs to the mix could accelerate these costs, burdening both individuals and the health system. Nutrition advocates are calling for urgent measures: clearer labelling, restrictions on marketing to children, and subsidies for fresh, minimally processed foods.

Meanwhile, the global conversation on food systems is shifting. Researchers emphasize that the problem isn’t just personal choice—it’s structural. From farming practices to supermarket pricing, the system is designed to favour ultra-processed products. Without intervention, Australia risks locking itself into a cycle of declining public health and rising medical costs.

The message from science is clear: ultra-processed foods are not benign convenience items—they are a public health hazard. Whether Australia’s food policy will address this reality or exacerbate it remains to be seen. For now, experts warn that the nation’s diet could be heading toward a perfect storm of policy and pathology.

New year’s resolution -- organic, whole foods in 2026!

Read the full story here.